« X-ploitation | Main | Things I wish I'd known at 20 »

August 22, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451cbef69e200d83488db5b69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Acceptable inequalities:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Blimpish

Remember there's also much greater freedom over pay-setting in US universities (at least, a lot of the top end ones) - didn't Barro pick up a Chair paying $400,000 a few years back? Plus, a lot of them offer free or discounted tuition for your children, which at an Ivy League school is the equivalent of a six figure sum.

Arnold Kling

Academics has managed to create a super high class--the tenured Ivy League professor; and a super low class--the adjunct professor. In terms of prestige--which is the locus of competition in academia--there is very little to be had outside the top schools. Academics is a pyramid with a small top and a large low base (with the adjuncts below the base, in the basement as it were).

In business, there is much more of a middle class (middle managers) and there is nothing in business that corresponds to the low status of the Ph.D adjunct--someone with lots of qualifications and no income or status.

Glen

In the US, I find the 'brightest' people tend to be drawn to the private sector while those who can just regurgitate information go into academia or the public sector. This is just a general observation based on my own experience. I know very bright people in academia and dullards in business and, even then, a lot of business people don't tend to follow up on things that aren't profitable. Also, one's own experience is limited and colored by one's world view.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Why S&M?

Blog powered by Typepad