« Ugly and stupid | Main | Managerialism vs technocracy »

May 25, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

dearieme

Trade, invention, liberty, sound money and small government: do you think we'll ever see a party that stands for those? We get the smirks of Clinton or W, the inane grins of Blair, and constriction, constraint, interference, prohibition, oppression, and on and on and on. Plus wars. Hang the lot of them.

Matt M

Okay, I'm going to expose my ignorance here: Tankies?

Igor Belanov

'Tankies' is a disparaging phrase used to refer to those on the left who supported the Russian invasion which crushed the Hungarian Uprising of 1956. As a result it came to be associated with the Communist Party and those who continued to support it afterwards, though in other countries, notably Italy, Socialist parties also had groups of 'Tankies'. Obviously Aaronovitch, Reid and Mandelson are ex-members of the CPGB.

Matt M

Thanks.

Backword Dave

Tanks for dat, Igor. ;-)

Phil at work

I agree with all of this except the suggestion that it's in some sense surprising. But now I'm just playing "I was an anti-managerialist before you were", so never mind.

1956 was the biggest split in Western Communist ranks, but it wasn't the last time true believers earned the 'tankie' label. According to someone who knew him at the time, Charlie "Living on thin air" Leadbeater actually joined the CP *after the suppression of Solidarnosc*. (Come to think of it, when was it Aaro left the party?)

acrylic call custom duck

I feel like a fog, not that it matters. I've pretty much been doing nothing , but eh. Today was a loss. I haven't gotten much done for a while.

Steve

We are better off today than we were eight years ago

Celexa pills antidepressant pills overnight shipping free prescription

Free prescription FedEx overnight shipping pills

The comments to this entry are closed.

Why S&M?

Blog powered by Typepad