« A 1980s throwback | Main | Relative poverty vs inequality »

November 27, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451cbef69e200d834fec79469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brown vs Hayek:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

dearieme

Brown was a bright schoolboy who, alas, went on to immerse himself in those intellectual stagnant ponds, labour history and the History of Labour. So why your surprise that his book is limp?

james higham

What’s annoying here is that Brown just doesn’t even consider Hayek’s view of markets or the possibility of state failure. He’s as ignorant of Hayek as he is of Oakeshott.

Pretty simple Chris - it's the amateur versus the professional.

Meh

Your point would be stronger if existing markets in social provision had actually discovered new things. The empirical fact that they haven't points us to the idea that Hayek's theory of markets as "discoverers" can be both true and irrelevant in this case.

Funny that, eh?

IVA Advice UK

Does it always get structured in this way or only under these specific circumstances? - Thanks, Kyle

The comments to this entry are closed.

Why S&M?

Blog powered by Typepad