How far can globalization raise the incomes of poorer countries? How far can foreign aid help? A new NBER paper (pdf) by James Feyrer and Francesco Caselli sheds interesting light on these questions.
Their first contribution is to estimate the marginal product of capital (MPK) in 53 developed and developing countries. They estimate that low income countries - those poorer than Portugal - have an average MPK of 27 per cent, whilst richer countries have an average MPK of 11 per cent.
This is just what you'd expect. Capital is scarce in poorer countries, so its return should be higher.
However, what you'd also expect to happen is that these higher MPKs would attract capital flows from the rich countries to the poor ones, thus enriching the poor countries.
This, of course, doesn't happen. The US's massive current account deficit means it is sucking in capital from poorer countries. And FDI flows much more between rich countries than it does from rich countries to Africa; the data's here (reg. reqd).
This capital immobility is enormously expensive. If capital did flow to equalize MPKs, estimate Caselli and Feyrer, developing countries would see a 25 per cent rise in their incomes.
So why is capital immobile? One view blames capital market imperfections; the (undiversifiable?) risk of investing in poorer countries is too high. This is the origin of Michael Dooley's view that the US current account deficit is sustainable because it's a source of collateral for poorer countries.
However, Caselli and Feyrer have two other explanations.
First,they say, poorer countries lack essential complentarities with physical capital, such as skilled labour (one could add transport links as well).
Second, they say, the price of physical capital is higher in poorer nations, because it attracts taxation, exortioners and rent-seekers.
These explanations, they believe, more than suffice to explain capital immobility. Indeed, they say, credit market frictions, far from impeding capital flows into poorer countries might actually impede outflows - by, for example, limiting the use of offshore accounts.
There's something in this for everyone. The anti-globalizers can take away the message that the orthodox neoclassical case for globalization is too optimistic, at least in one respect.
The anti-foreign aid brigade can take the message that financial aid to poorer countries will not raise incomes much because financial returns on investment aren't as great as MPKs would suggest.
Me? I take the message that our overwhelming moral responsiblity to help the poor should means we should encourage institutional change to reduce the cost of investing.
If it's worth doing in Iraq, it's worth doing elsewhere...
"Me? I take the message that our overwhelming moral responsiblity to help the poor means we should encourage institutional change to reduce the cost of investing.
If it's worth doing in Iraq, it's worth doing elsewhere... "
My thoughts precisely! I will link to this article from my blog
Posted by: Curious | August 19, 2005 at 03:31 PM
I buy the argument that the risk of investment in poorer countries is too high, but it isn't unidentifiable.
All you need to do is ask "how big is the informal sector?" If the informal sector is big, then unsustainable regulation is pushing people and business into the informal sector and is keeping productivity and formal sector employment low there.
The most important investments in poor countries come from their own entrepreneurs. If they don't feel they can invest in the formal sector, then something is badly wrong.
I really don't believe that in a country with a large informal sector that one can not actually effectively compute the return on capital, because people are trying to hide that capital from the government, and the bit you can measure is probably rent-seeking and protected by bribes.
Poorer western countries have their own problem - unemployment because of labor regulations. This shows up as unemployment in Europe, because they have such good unemployment compensation, but shows up as informal sector work in very poor countries (and in the US as illegal alien labor).
To become rich, you need regulation that matches your socio-economic state, or else the informal sector will boom, and the country will stop growing rich. As a country grows richer, it can afford to regulate itself more, not the other way around.
Posted by: Mr. Econotarian | August 19, 2005 at 06:23 PM
I guess one question to answer is - why does capital flow to China and not to Africa? Presumably there is a belief that large returns are available in China but not so in Africa. However, the MPK in China must have fallen sharply in recent years. I suspect the Chinese authorities have overcome some of the problems that James Feyrer and Francesco Caselli identify, like ensuring there is skilled labour and subsidising the cost of physical capital with cheap loans. There also seems to be a sort of bubble effect in China, with firms worried that they will be criticised if they do not have a "China Strategy" as they would previously have been criticised for not having an "Internet Strategy".
Posted by: Rob Hayward | August 20, 2005 at 09:20 AM
"I guess one question to answer is - why does capital flow to China and not to Africa? Presumably there is a belief that large returns are available in China but not so in Africa."
Because the Chinese are genetically more intelligent than Africans. Africa will always be poor because of this.
Posted by: xfdgdfg | February 20, 2006 at 09:17 PM
The previous comment is definately from a wimp.
Can you show any study that points even a single fact to support what you post.
American and EU companies are investing in China due to the fear that the Chinese (Who have no respect for patents and intellectual property) may eventually produce competing products better and at a cheaper cost than them.
Posted by: Ken | August 29, 2006 at 05:01 PM
my funny story
A man walks into his local pub with a big grin on his face.
"What are you so happy about?" asks the barman.
"Well, I'll tell you," replies the man. "You know, I live by the railroad tracks. Well, on my way home last night, I noticed a young woman tied to the tracks, like in the films.
I, of course, went and cut her free and took her back to my place.
Anyway, to make a long story short, I scored big time! We made love all night, all over the house. We did everything, me on top, sometimes her on top, every position imaginable!"
"Fantastic!" exclaimed the barman. "You lucky bd. Was she pretty?"
"Dunno... never found the head!"
___________________________
If you have prostate problems or high blood pressure for which you take medicines called alpha-blockers, your doctor may start you on a lower dose of VIAGRA.
[url=http://buyviagra.eusme.info/viagra-sale.html]viagra sale[/url]
Posted by: jezonimo | July 29, 2007 at 01:42 PM
Hello!
i found FREE xbox and iphone on the [URL=http://freestuffes.com]freestuffes.com[/URL], it is real??!
Posted by: ZoneWeb | July 30, 2007 at 11:42 PM
Heya!!
see [URL=http://filmsbuy.com]filmsbuy.com[/URL] site with thousands movies for downloads!! it is legal or no?
Posted by: BigBoomer | August 01, 2007 at 02:41 AM
An American, a Japanese and a Canadian were sitting naked in a sauna when suddenly there was a beeping sound. The American pressed his forearm, and the beep stopped. The others looked at him questioningly. "That was my pager he said. "I have a microchip under the skin of my arm."
A few minutes later a phone rang. The Japanese fellow lifted his palm to his ear. When he finished he explained "That was my mobile phone, I have a microchip in my hand."
The Canadian felt decidedly low-tech, but not to be outdone, he decided he had to do something just as impressive. He stepped out of the sauna and went to the toilet. He returned with a piece of toilet paper hanging from his butt. The others raised their eyebrows and stared at him. The Canadian finally said "Well, will you look at that! I'm getting a fax."
__________________
If you take any medicines that have nitrates in them (like nitroglycerin for chest pain)—every day or even once in a while—you should NOT take [url=http://reddit.com/user/viagra_cheap/]viagra cheap[/url]
Posted by: Smumrik | August 04, 2007 at 12:23 AM
Hello!
Mega Millions, [url=http://www.euromillotter.com/?aff=22680]Powerball[/url], Lotto 6/49, Super 7, [url=http://www.euromillotter.com/?aff=22680]Euro million[/url], New York Lotto - Be the Next Jackpot Winner With The Only Online Service That Enables You To Purchase Official Lottery Tickets From Around The World.
[url=http://www.euromillotter.com/?aff=22680]Click Here![/url]
Posted by: arrittyAllege | August 12, 2007 at 12:22 AM
heey!!:) I want to find the sexy boys!
Im just a nice girl looking for a nice guy!:)
see my profile [url=http://www.datingfantastic.com/viewProfile.do?nickname=sugarbaby2007]sugar baby[/url]
Posted by: BabyCrem | August 12, 2007 at 10:01 PM
[url=http://vangelis.eusme.info/vangelis-download.html]Vangelis[/url] uses a technique of recording all tracks simultaneously on tape, using a device especially manufactured for him which he calls the "Direct box".
"He explains his customary method of approach. As soon as the musical idea is there, as many keyboards as possible are connected to the control-desk, which in turn are directly connected to the applicable tracks of the multi-trackmachine.
[url=http://vangelis.eusme.info]vangelis mp3[/url]
Posted by: Spoofselesy | August 23, 2007 at 05:14 AM
urheqxvti agbqswkdx uaxjmow hklyap xaoktlhij ikxfh mpehzf
Posted by: zcly racnk | October 24, 2007 at 06:33 AM
qlhdawmv afwykm zwvjdkc xgqlvkhyf grmeuzj xpeybau jdwve http://www.tylo.rdypt.com
Posted by: tlvc flrjuzeso | October 24, 2007 at 06:33 AM
very interesting.
i'm adding in RSS Reader
Posted by: music | January 06, 2008 at 11:53 PM
Somebody ought to cross ball point pens with coat hangers so that the
pens will multiply instead of disappear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://blurty.com/users/carrieburksxd
Posted by: eviqueFuene | May 07, 2008 at 09:16 PM
Thank you very much for the information I really appreciate it!!
Posted by: Order Tadalafil | March 12, 2009 at 05:53 AM
I don't know about this topic more.But By reading your post I got impressed.Now I am interesting to know more about this.
Posted by: Cialis Order | October 13, 2009 at 11:22 PM
I would guess that living in a poor country, and being born under harsh conditions, it is what people know as life. When one is exposed to the outside world and start looking at life in other peoples dimensions then, they term themselves or are termed poor. But how do you explain so many people from these 'rich countries' coming to africa to watch wild beest migration, has any african gone to new york or berlin to witness snow fall. We are all poor or rich depending on what perspective we view our lives, the other person sees you being poor.
Posted by: Peter Mwenda | February 18, 2010 at 11:07 AM