« Don't blame the parents | Main | The inflation problem »

May 14, 2007

Comments

dearieme

Some might suspect that the catatrophic consequences of the assassination in Sarajevo would outweigh anything else one might think of. Just suppose - no Lenin and therefore no Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot.....

Shuggy

"Some might suspect that the catatrophic consequences of the assassination in Sarajevo would outweigh anything else one might think of."

Nah - Archie Duke wasn't really a political leader. And if it hadn't been that, it would have been something else.

dearieme

I suspect you're right, Shuggy; I'm just jeering at the laughable notion that a little bit of arithmetic can settle such issues.

Bob B

I see that in other countries, they tend to settle outstanding football manager issues more decisively than after our pusillanimous manner in Britain:

"The president of a leading Bulgarian football team, Lokomotiv Plovdiv, has been shot dead in a suburb of the capital, Sofia. . . "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6654625.stm

pommygranate

I wonder whether Saddam shouldn't just have been assassinated.

pommygranate

'Assassination of autocrats is more likely to lead to change than assassination of a democrat.'

Machiavelli devoted two chapters to this in The Prince.

His advice to would-be war-mongers was to assassinate the leaders of autocratically run countries and then rule tyranically, but to assimilate the leaders of more democratic countries

Bob B

I must admit to being a tad disappointed with S&M's thread header here. At least we could have had assassination as but one among a graduated range of incentives on offer for resolving principal-agent problems.

The comments to this entry are closed.

blogs I like

Blog powered by Typepad