Why is West Indian cricket so bad? Here's a theory - only a partial, tentative explanation. But it's an overlooked possibility.
It's because the players' names are unusual.
Take the current side: Chris, Daren, Devon, Runiko, Shivnarine, Dwayne, Danesh, Darren, Jerome, Corey, Fidel. Five of these names are pretty rare, and only two are older, common ones: Darren and Chris.
Compare the side that blackwashed England in 1984: Gordon, Des, Larry, Viv, Clive, Jeff, Malcolm, Eldine, Roger, Michael and Joel. Only one name is really unusual, and most are old, common names.
This matters for a simple reason. If a boy has a common name, he'll think: "I'm nothing special. I'm going to have to work to make a name for myself." So Michaels, Malcolms and Roys practice harder. But if a boy has an unusual name, he'll think: "I'm special, unique. I can be me." He'll not practice so hard, thinking that talent and self-expression are sufficient.
The upshot is that people with common names will be more likely - at the margin and with exceptions - to put in the hard work necessary to succeed.
This is just a hunch based upon one data set. But there's more evidence. This paper (pdf) says:
More popular names are associated with better lifetime outcomes: that is, more education, occupational prestige and income, and a reduced likelihood of having a child before 25.
And teachers apparently think kids with unusual names are less likely to do well at school than ones with commoner names - an expectation that might be self-fulfilling.
So, maybe names matter.
Jerome has been around for quite a while, and Shivnarine is a pretty common name. Also, quite hard to fit Garfield Sobers into this model.
Posted by: dsquared | June 09, 2007 at 03:24 PM
The teachers aren't (or more's the point, are) controlling for other factors.
On the cricket team, if those names were unusual in the W.Indies in the early to mid 1980s, and to people with them didn't feel the need to try very hard (a theory that doesn't make much sense to me, but let's accept it) then how did they get into the national team in the first place ahead of the Johns and Daves?
Posted by: Matthew | June 09, 2007 at 04:24 PM
I have a feeling it's mistaking correlation for causation. In the case of younger pregnancies - lower income families are statistically likely to have children who give birth younger, and are more likely to give their children unusual names - perhaps, in keeping with your logic, in an effort to make them feel more special. Middle class families assume their children can feel special by earning more etc, and so give them more conventional names. At the same time they are likely to have babies at a later stage of their lives. Upper class people, with their bizarre names, distort this, but there aren't enough of them to skew it back to equilibrium.
Posted by: Chris | June 09, 2007 at 05:38 PM
I was in the West Indies in March - not to see the World Cup, but it was on at the time. Talking to some of the locals, they blamed the decline on the need for the selectors to show 'balance' between the islands/nations. It was pointed out to me that during the 1980's there were 5 Antiguans in the team but that couldn't happen today, no matter the skills of the individuals. I'm no cricket expert but it seems to me to be a better explanation than names.
Posted by: PykeatBex | June 09, 2007 at 07:50 PM
For your next trick, the decline of rugby and football in Scotland and England? Too many Davids and Franks and Stevies and Michaels and....
Posted by: dearieme | June 09, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Curtly Ambrose. Courtney Walsh!
Posted by: Alex | June 10, 2007 at 12:51 PM
The team that started the WI domination in the early sixties was, at full strength: Conrad, Joey, Rohan, Seymour, Basil, Garfield, Frank, Derrick, Wesley, Charlie and Lancelot, which breaks down as roughly 50/50 odd and boring. I reckon a good mix is the secret.
Posted by: chris y | June 10, 2007 at 02:30 PM
Chris: I have a feeling it's mistaking correlation for causation.
I agree, but is that just an opinion?
Posted by: Roger Thornhill | June 11, 2007 at 10:48 AM
Even if true, your theory only serves to prove why these 11 individuals are not very good. Unless of course there is a recent trend in the whole of the West Indies for unusual names.
Posted by: Stuart | June 11, 2007 at 12:19 PM
This is hogwash.
Posted by: Geronimo Napoleon Jones | June 13, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Unusual for whom?
I see but two unusual name from the current squad as listed in your post (Runako & Fidel). All the others are true West Indian names reflecting the racial origins of the people brought to the Caribbean during colonial times.
Ramdin (Denesh), Ganga (Daren) and Chanderpaul (Shiv), for example, come from territories where the populations are half Asian in composition and whose presence in the Caribbean can be traced back to the British encouraging Asian "indentured servants" to emmigrate there as a solution to labour shortages on sugar plantations after the abolition of the slave trade and slavery itself 30 odd years later.
Fidel, brother of Pedro, is unusual in Barbados. As is Runako (middle name Shakur)in Nevis. But those are the only two a West Indian (and I am one) would see as such.
Curiously, these two have been amongst the best performers on the tour so far. Morton scored a ton against Somerset, a double ton vs the MCC and batted well in the last Test (one fifty).
And Fidel has pushed into the side (not difficult given the state of the attack) and, a reasonable observer would conclude, bowled far better than his returns suggest.
Nice device (truly) but in this example the reasons the West Indies are so weak lies elsewhere!
Posted by: RJH Adams | June 15, 2007 at 09:48 AM
Thanks boysdad0414b3c2732e9e7888c5f98bae75a
Posted by: http://musicdownloads4free.angelfire.com/free-music.html | December 10, 2007 at 09:14 PM
Never frown, when you are sad, because you never know who is falling in love with your smile.
Posted by: Ugg london | January 12, 2010 at 12:33 AM
CHI flat iron by Farouk system. Direct from the manufacturer, this genuine Chi ceramic iron comes with valid, one year warranty!
Posted by: chi flat iron | January 18, 2010 at 09:31 AM
I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!
Posted by: louboutin schaussures | September 30, 2011 at 02:55 PM