Steve Rushin is brilliant on the true outrage of the US's political system - it's bias against bald men (via Norm). In this, Britain and America are united; as Christie Davies has pointed out, we haven't elected a bald PM since the 1950s either.
Why is there this discrimination? Three things make it especially puzzling:
1. Bald Prime Ministers have been good. Churchill, Attlee and Gladstone are, arguably, our three greatest ever PMs, even though between them they didn't have enough hair to string a ukulele. What we have here is therefore taste discrimination, not statistical discrimination.
2. Bald men don't suffer discrimination in other areas. I know of no evidence that they have worse earnings or job prospects than hirsute ones.
3. Appearance isn't valued in women politicians. Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merkel (and Golda Meir or Indira Gandhi before them) look like bulldogs sucking a lemon, but this was no obstacle to their success. Conversely, there's no talk of Caroline Flint as a future Labour leader.
So, what's the solution? One possibility is that baldness looks bad on TV; you don't see many bald newsreaders (I don't believe the rumours about Sophie Raworth).
But this runs into the problem that many bald men have succeeded as screen actors: Ben Kingsley, Sean Connery, Vin Diesel, Telly Savalas, Patrick Stewart etc. And what's more, shouldn't the public recognise that TV appearance is not an important part of the job of being PM?
So, here are two other theories.
First, bald men - because of our superior intellect and virility - are seen as threatening; this is why they are often cast as baddies, such as the evil Hood in Thunderbirds. (Perhaps the childhood trauma he caused is itself part of the explanation). But what the public want from politicians is comfort and the illusion of security. Hairy boys, being blander, offer this.
Secondly, the people who report on politics want politics to be a vacuous, glamorous business. They don't want to think their job consists of no more than talk about who can best empty our dustbins. And they certainly don't want to investigate substantive questions of who is genuinely competent to run the country.
And glamour is identified with having hair. In this respect, perhaps its no coincidence that discrimination against bald politicians has emerged at the same time - since the 50s - as rock n' roll. Pop stars are almost never bald, which adds to the identification between glamour and hairyness.
"Conversely, there's no talk of Caroline Flint as a future Labour leader".
I was slightly disturbed to find myself fantasising about Caroline Flint last night while she was being interviewed about the immigration figures on the news. Harriet Harman was pretty fit when younger and has made deputy PM ?
Posted by: Matt Munro | November 01, 2007 at 04:59 PM
And William Hague, who apparently shaves his head, is shadow foreign secretary. But then he comes from Yorkshire.
Posted by: Bob B | November 01, 2007 at 08:59 PM
Peter Garrett, pop star, politician and baldie. The exception which proves the rule perhaps?
Posted by: Blognor Regis | November 01, 2007 at 09:40 PM
Bald men symbolise the Reality Principle, for which The Age has little taste. Present company excepted.
Posted by: dearieme | November 01, 2007 at 11:06 PM
"First, bald men - because of our superior intellect and virility - are seen as threatening"
Ha ha - keep telling yourself that and maybe it'll come true. Baldness is quite rightly a handicap in politics, as well as in life in general. Those of us who are over forty but still have a full head of hair know you baldies resent us bitterly and would dearly love to impose taxes on our flowing locks, should you come to power.
Posted by: Shuggy | November 02, 2007 at 09:48 AM
If one has to be bald to do well in the "glamorous" business of politics, does this extend to pundits and reporters? While I note Mad Mel has a full head of hair, Andrew Marr and Nick Robinson do not, and they seem to be doing alright for themselves.
Posted by: a very public sociologist | November 02, 2007 at 12:03 PM
Perhaps there are just fewer bald men than you think?
Posted by: ad | November 02, 2007 at 04:46 PM
Nick Robinson is not only very bald, he is quite stupid as well.
I don't know what bearing this has on your arguments but I thought it needed saying. That's all.
Posted by: Paulie | November 03, 2007 at 06:27 PM
Nick Robinson is not only very bald, he is quite stupid as well.
I don't know what bearing this has on your arguments but I thought it needed saying. That's all.
Posted by: Paulie | November 03, 2007 at 06:27 PM
John Wayne, Marlon Brando and Robert Montgomery, Prez Eisenhour's tv adviser, wore toupees, as did Bing Crosby. They survived for decades in the public spotlight.
Now that pols are using the techniques of Hollywood and tvland, surely a wig is not out of the question.
Of course, there is less 'nuns'' hair available.
Incidentally, I am also lacking in this area.
Hu
Posted by: Hugh Markey | November 04, 2007 at 04:35 PM
Politics is showbiz for ugly people, baldy or otherwise.
Posted by: Bruce | November 05, 2007 at 01:34 PM
My brother, with hair, argues that the roots of hair grow down deeper and deeper. If they strike gray matter, the hair turns gray; if they strike nothing, they fall out.
Sen. Jake Garn, R-Utah (long retired), whose shiny pate was famous in television studios, said that men have only a finite amount of "the male hormone." "Some men choose to use theirs growing hair," he would sniff.
The reality is that most people say, "Hair follicles? Who's counting?"
Vox Day has a particularly vapid analysis, which I have poked a fork into at my blog, Millard Fillmore's Bathtub. C'mon by.
Posted by: Ed Darrell | November 06, 2007 at 12:53 PM
Random suggestions:
Bald pop stars? Errol Brown of Hot Chocolate, Isaac Hayes, Seal (does this argument only apply to white males?)
Baldness and phrenology - high cranium...superior intellect...The Mekon?
Re. Villiany: it's beards, not baldness (esp. in Disney, apparently)
Women and hair - it's length, perhaps? See Ruth Kelly (hair/voice), Yvette Cooper, or the way Mad Mel looks like a particularly scary psychiatrist.
Posted by: redpesto | November 07, 2007 at 01:46 PM
It's odd that bald men are discriminated against in politics but men who aren't good looking can do fine.
Posted by: W | March 24, 2008 at 09:35 AM
The online pharmacy no prescription phrase works on two distinct planes; the internet and non prescription medication. But, we are fusing the phrase so that it means something and we can use the constituent parts of the phrase to create an idea. The concept of “online pharmacy no prescription” is designed for the purpose of providing medication over the internet (online) for all those people all over the world who are in dire need of suitable medication at reasonable prices, which is exactly the reason behind generic meds.
Posted by: Online Pharmacy no Prescription | May 19, 2009 at 06:51 PM
Comments please
Posted by: Online Pharmacy no Prescription | May 19, 2009 at 06:51 PM
politics makes people bald 8) -- period haha
Posted by: hair loss treatment | July 24, 2009 at 01:29 AM
And glamour is identified with having hair.
Posted by: Buy Viagra | August 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM
Thanks, helpful source.
Posted by: us drugstore | September 06, 2009 at 05:55 PM
Nice one! Very informative post, thank you good job!
Posted by: Viagra Online | December 09, 2009 at 04:59 AM
You have a very good blog that the main thing a lot of interesting and useful!
Posted by: Comprar Viagra | January 28, 2010 at 06:19 AM
Surely there was no bald politicians in the Saudi Arabia..
Posted by: rx | January 28, 2010 at 08:38 PM
Thanks for posting this very genuinely interesting post. Online pharmacy is a tricky subject. Be sure what you are buying. If you are convinced, these links would act as guides. Thanks. Will be back to check out again.
Posted by: online pharmacy no prescription | February 02, 2010 at 10:45 AM
Thanks for posting this very genuinely interesting post. Online pharmacy is a tricky subject.
Posted by: ps3 цена | February 04, 2010 at 02:46 PM
It's seems it's nothing more than business as usual, try preserve and maintain a sinking ship putting plugs here and there to stop further leaking.I love Jesus, but his bride had better clean up her act if she ever hopes to make to the wedding feast.
Posted by: viagra online | August 17, 2010 at 08:51 PM
The selective use of Indra Gandhi as an example of a successful woman politician does not really apply here. She was PM of India where bald men have been very successful. Thus examples from India in general won't be applicable in the context of US/UK voter preferences.
Posted by: Diggy | December 03, 2011 at 11:42 PM