« McBride, pollack & New Labour | Main | Policy vs character in political reporting »

April 14, 2009

Comments

kinglear

Personally, I have long believed in the cock-up theory of humanity - if something can be a cock-up, it will be. I think this is a long standing position -during the last war people referred to things being SNAFU.
Situation Normal All Fouled Up

Mark

The great George Polya made an important related point. He said that mathematicians and scientists instinctively looked for cases that disproved their theories while other people tended to look for cases that confirmed them.

This raises some interesting questions about how we should classify economists.

Mark
daddywhatsarepublican.blogspot.com

dirigible

"bad incentives can cause rational people to look as if they are acting stupidly."

They look like it because they are.

Near-perfect functional equivalents of stupidity are not phantasmagorical epiphenomena generated by the behaviour of mis-incentivised really smart people. They are the desired outcome.

There are no non-perverse economic incentives.

sean

So in short the Stupid party are the most rational party to vote for at the next election?

"The desire to appear competent - to stick with your previous position" that would be all those voting for the materialist left?

As I wrote on the Yards blog "Its interesting that the bankers are in the dog house for taking too many risks, the lobby are in the dog house for taking too little"

Attorney Wright

"The desire to appear competent - to stick with your previous position"

This often occurs in the civil litigation field. Clients tend to mistake consistency with competency. Thus, in order to appear competent , attorneys are forced to stick with their initial litigation strategies regardless how the facts or law have subsequently changed. This is an irrational strategy if you want to win the lawsuit. However, it is a rational strategy if you want to keep the client.

And this is not just limited to laypersons unfamailair with the legal process.

I have worked with insurance adjusters for over 24 years. 70% of them are great. Another 30% stink. Why do they stink? Because they cannot conceive how a competent attorney could ever change his / her initial conclusions, regardless how significantly the facts or law have changed. If you want to continue to get work from these adjusters, you better not deviate one inch from your initial case assessement. If you do, you'll never see any further work. That is why every so often you'll see a bright, smart, hard-working attorney try a case based on a horrific legal theory totally inapproriate for the case.

M.G. in Progress

There is another aspect between stupidity and incompetence: it's negligence. Basically people do not care as long as they can gos back home and sleep comfortably.
For more see my Social norms versus market norms: how to screw the economy up
at
http://mgiannini.blogspot.com/2009/03/social-norms-versus-market-norms-how-to.html

ad

"George Polya ... said that mathematicians and scientists instinctively looked for cases that disproved their theories while other people tended to look for cases that confirmed them."

A cynic would say that scientists look for cases that disprove rivals of their theories.

Rocio

estan muy interesantes los temas felicidades.
http://rsepuesta-rapida.net

Steve

Absolutely I agree. Some smart people pretends to be always 'smart', that's why they are not making any right calls! This results in total collapse as happened recently in the U.S housing market.
http://www.paydayonly.co.uk/

Rowland

Malcolm Gladwell makes a similiar point. He says that the incentives to seem that you know what you're doing mean that confidence almost always turns into over-confidence.

http://www.rowlandmanthorpe.com/blog/2009/05/great-confidence-disasters/

dindigul

well, smart people always work smartly. but some of the people who is in lazy wants incentives for do their work.
giving incentives is one of the HR-tool for motivation

Tag Heuer

And a lot of it reflects a switch from bank deposits to securities; foreigners “other investments” in the UK, http://www.watchgy.com/ mostly bank deposits, fell by £143.2bn in Q1. And of course there’s no guarantee such buying will continue.
http://www.watchgy.com/tag-heuer-c-24.html
http://www.watchgy.com/rolex-submariner-c-8.html

Frank

Great points on here. I think it's always best to have someone to back up another persons thoughts... or knock them back.

Frank

Unfortunately there will always be stupid people...
http://www.hourpaydayloans.co.uk/quick_cash.aspx

The comments to this entry are closed.

blogs I like

Why S&M?

Blog powered by Typepad