« Inequality vs relative poverty | Main | Hester's pay: the underlying questions »

June 22, 2009



Shanksfoor..that, I think.

Are yoos taken the pees?


Aka, Stubbornly Taking Booze.


I love the way you construct these arguments from thin air, Chris. Quite inventive.


This is clutching at straws. Shy or outgoing, you tend to have a fixed budget for drinking. Price goes up = less booze bought. Not rocket science, just basic economics.

Luis Enrique

JimH, this post is about binge drinking, not the overall quantity of drinking.

I don't know whether it's true or not, but Scandanavia does have a reputation for binge drinking, and alcohol prices are high there, so if so, that's empirical support of Chris's idea. I don't know whether the overall quantity of drinking in Scandanavia is lower than in the Southern Europe, would be interesting to know.


Jim H - it's entirely possible for demand for alcohol to fall as prices rise, and yet binge drinking might rise - eg if we reduce the number of one-or-two pint sessions, whilst making a day of it on the occasions we do go for a drink.
"Basic economics" is often an excuse for sloppy thinking.


Good article for justifying drinking! Connecting taxes, shyness and drink is really amazing! awesome writing!

Ugg london

Never frown, when you are sad, because you never know who is falling in love with your smile.

chi flat iron

CHI flat iron by Farouk system. Direct from the manufacturer, this genuine Chi ceramic iron comes with valid, one year warranty!

supra vaider

I like you on facebook and follow through google reader!

The comments to this entry are closed.

blogs I like

Blog powered by Typepad