Having children makes you miserable. That’s the message of this paper by Luca Stanca, which draws upon data from 94 countries:
However, the reason for this is rather mundane. Children make (many) people less happy only because they are expensive. Mr Stanca finds that children improve people’s satisfaction with non-financial aspects of their life, but worsen their financial happiness. This corroborates some other evidence (hat-tip).
Even so, this raises questions. Why do people not eventually adapt to having children, with the result that their happiness is unaffected by them? If having children reduces well-being for so many people, is this a failure of rationality? If so, why? Is there just a problem of self-control here, or the power of the desire to conform, or some other bias? If it's rational for (many) people not to have children, why does such a choice often bring with it huge stigma?
And if it is irrational to have children, why should we respect the rights of parents over those children - for example, their right to give them a religious education?
Having children is negatively related to subjective well-being. Conditioning on individual characteristics shows that the effect of parenthood on well-being is positive and significant only for widowers, older and highly educated individuals…On the basis of a purely economic approach, the optimal number of children for a rational agent is zero.This partly corroborates evidence from the UK (pdf), which shows that children increase the well-being only of married couples and widowers, but reduce the well-being of single or separated parents.
However, the reason for this is rather mundane. Children make (many) people less happy only because they are expensive. Mr Stanca finds that children improve people’s satisfaction with non-financial aspects of their life, but worsen their financial happiness. This corroborates some other evidence (hat-tip).
Even so, this raises questions. Why do people not eventually adapt to having children, with the result that their happiness is unaffected by them? If having children reduces well-being for so many people, is this a failure of rationality? If so, why? Is there just a problem of self-control here, or the power of the desire to conform, or some other bias? If it's rational for (many) people not to have children, why does such a choice often bring with it huge stigma?
And if it is irrational to have children, why should we respect the rights of parents over those children - for example, their right to give them a religious education?
What has having irrational wishes to do with having rights related to the wish? For instance, it could be irrational to assign a high value to owning a home (relative to renting), but that doesn't mean we shouldn't respect property rights.
Posted by: reason | November 09, 2009 at 02:59 PM
Any discussion of this subject would need to be informed by the number of children born as a result of a decision to have children and the number of children born only as a decision to have sex.
The later being driven by short term non-financial need.
Posted by: Clive King | November 09, 2009 at 03:11 PM
This article reminds me why economics is known as the dismal science.
Posted by: Guido Fawkes | November 09, 2009 at 03:37 PM
"irrational to have children"??
Only if you identify rationality with maximizing "happiness". That's far from clear.
Posted by: william | November 09, 2009 at 03:48 PM
"Why do people not eventually adapt to having children"
Because children aren't constant. Just as you start to adapt to them they change the rules and make you miserable all over again. Financially usually, but not always. Why don't parents complain more? Too bloody tired.
Posted by: Mike Woodhouse | November 09, 2009 at 03:56 PM
Given that, even in the UK married couples with children are an absolute majority of those with children, why should their activity be seen as irrational. Children increase well being for married couples, so they go on and have children. Where is the irrationality?
Posted by: tolkein | November 09, 2009 at 04:02 PM
I suppose the fact that every cell in our body is programmed to reproduce itself must outway rational thought!
Posted by: Chris Allison | November 09, 2009 at 04:22 PM
Chris
I think the answer lies in the fact that the act of having kids changes the subject of the question "am I happy". Because once you have kids, the question is never just about you any more. It changes the self, to be pretentious about it.
The question to ask is: does becoming a parent increase the wellbeing of you and your kids as they come to exist? And I find the answer is always yes.
That also suits the genetic imperative to reproduce, of course.
Posted by: Giles | November 09, 2009 at 09:53 PM
From experience I have found that parents complain more when they are constantly tired out from caring for/running around after children. It makes sense that children cause less unhappiness to parents who are older and more highly educated because the former would have less to do as their children would be able to care for themselves and the latter can buy in services such as cleaning, gardening, childcare, private medical and education etc.
Posted by: SC | November 10, 2009 at 11:39 AM
Isn't it rather irrational to be expect humans always to make rational decisions, particularly in cases (as with reproduction) where their decisions are so very clearly driven (largely if not entirely) by powerful instincts?
Posted by: MM | November 10, 2009 at 12:41 PM
If you're interested in a new approach to boost your happiness based on the latest positive psychology research, check out our iPhone app: Live Happy; it's based on the work of Dr. Sonja Lyubomirsky, author of "The How of Happiness" and provides a unique method to create a personalized program to increase your happiness.
You can also learn more about the iPhone app on our Facebook page.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2009 at 04:16 PM
People without children may state that they are happy but they don't know what they are missing. The rewards of being a parent are not visible until you become one, but the penalties seem obvious to all.
Posted by: Nicole S | November 11, 2009 at 07:22 PM
Yeah I am agree with you Nicole. There is life without the children. Children makes our life colorful. They remember us our childhood. I have 2 children. We are just coming back from London via LMT.
Posted by: Paris Hotels | November 14, 2009 at 08:03 AM
And a lot of it reflects a switch from bank deposits to securities; foreigners “other investments” in the UK, http://www.watchgy.com/ mostly bank deposits, fell by £143.2bn in Q1. And of course there’s no guarantee such buying will continue.
http://www.watchgy.com/tag-heuer-c-24.html
http://www.watchgy.com/rolex-submariner-c-8.html
Posted by: replica rolex watches | December 27, 2009 at 04:15 PM
Never frown, when you are sad, because you never know who is falling in love with your smile.
Posted by: Ugg london | January 12, 2010 at 12:34 AM
CHI flat iron by Farouk system. Direct from the manufacturer, this genuine Chi ceramic iron comes with valid, one year warranty!
Posted by: chi flat iron | January 18, 2010 at 09:41 AM
I just sent this post to a bunch of my friends as I agree with most of what you’re saying here and the way you’ve presented it is awesome.
Posted by: bieber supra | December 15, 2011 at 01:03 PM