There's one worrying aspect of Tweeters' abuse of high-profile women that hasn't had the attention it should get - that it further undermines what we might call the liberal optimists' case for free speech.
I'm referring to the idea that free speech will enable us to progress towards the "truth". "Wrong opinions and practices gradually yield to fact and argument: but facts and arguments, to produce any effect on the mind, must be brought before it" wrote Mill. Free speech, wrote Rawls, "is necessary if political affairs are to be conducted in a rational fashion."
Such a view seems fanciful. This is not just because free speech gives us rape and bomb threats from those trying to silence women. The free press delivers not so much a healthy diversity of views but a mix of managerialist centrism, imbecilic linkbait and herp and derp. Not that the fault is all on the sell-side. Readers seek out whatever tosh corrobates their prejudice and self-regard, and even when they do encounter balanced reporting, they apply asymmetric Bayesianism and so entrench (pdf) their prejudice.
The idea that free speech will give us intellectual progress seems, then, optimistic. Rawls might be right - it might be necessary for rational debate. But it sure ain't sufficient.
You might object here that freedom has given us social progress; attitudes to women, ethnic minorities and gays are much better now than they were in the 50s and 60s. But I'm not sure this represents a victory for free speech rather than the dying out of old attitudes and the replacement by newer ones; to paraphrase Max Planck, civilization advances one funeral at a time. Indeed, it might even represent the opposite of freedom - a triumph of a new form of conformism which (partially) represses racism, homophobia and misogyny.
However, just because the optimistic liberal case for free speech is weak, it does not follow at all that there's a case for restricting such speech. The pessimistic case for freedom remains.
By this, I mean the idea that it's impossible in practice to cut out sick speech whilst not repressing healthy forms - and as my Top Blogging sidebar shows, there are plenty of these. Several people have rightly pointed out that a "report abuse" button on Twitter will soon become a "report opinions I don't like" button. And this principle generalizes. Powers to restrict egregiously abusive speech will be used to restrict others' freedom. I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake.
But then, as a privileged white man, I would say that, wouldn't I?
What a paradise the Earth would be without the scourge of the privileged white man. Without him the whole world would walk happily arm in arm singing Kumbaya together in eternal peace and harmony.
Maybe we should introduce voluntary euthanasia for self-loathing privileged white men to bring this dream closer to reality.
Posted by: Elmo Revenge | August 06, 2013 at 03:03 PM
I think free speech, while imperfect, is a better option than restricted speech.
In Belgium we don't have the same level of freedom of speech than in the UK or US. What I see (I meaning I, it's very open for debate) is that we have a number of far right movements that intelligently stay between the bound of the legal speech, effectively being wolves disguised as sheep. (And when they DO cross the borders of speech, they get dismantled and then reform the next day with a different name with the same initials)
I believe that situation attracts a number of followers that genuinely believe that we demonise the far right and that's they are not as dangerous as we say it is, proof is their speech is harmless...
Not to mention that some media like twitter are natively global while definition of free speech is still very local.
Posted by: François | August 06, 2013 at 03:03 PM
Btw the right don't have a monopoly on hate speech:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/8610904/Writer-Kia-Abdullah-mocks-death-of-gap-year-students-on-Twitter.html
Just off the top of my head
Posted by: Elmo Revenge | August 06, 2013 at 03:08 PM
if I understand you correctly, the liberal-optimist vision does not suggest imbeciles don't exist, it suggest they will lose the argument and the truth will triumph. I don't see how imbeciles typing rape threats into Twitter undermines, or is inconsistent, with that. These odious individuals are not winning the argument or stifling progress or anything like that. They are causing distress, but they get shouted down in short order, don't they?
Posted by: Luis Enrique | August 06, 2013 at 03:48 PM
I'm not sure the liberal attitude towards free speech is actually as "optimistic" as you think it is.
Mill was influenced by the pragmatic tradition of Utilitarianism, and you can see a continuation of his thought in Hayek and Popper - i.e. the belief that we do not (and possibly cannot) know the truth and must therefore allow the "liberty of opinion" to maximise the possibility of intellectual advance.
The really optimistic (and therefore scary) attitude is that of the censor - i.e the belief that by suppressing bad or dangerous opinions we can make society better.
To give them their due, feminists like Criado-Perez have emphasised that the real issue is the prevalence of misogyny and how the police and businesses are reluctant to tackle it, rather than the lack of a "twat" button on social media.
Posted by: FromArseToElbow | August 06, 2013 at 04:03 PM
It should be pointed out that internet abuse affects both men and women and women are not really a special case. Men are silenced too you know.
Posted by: SteveH | August 06, 2013 at 04:49 PM
@ Francois
That's an interesting point, that repressing extremist views makes their realisation more likely. I think your point, that it is better to have them in the open where they can be exposed is more effective and in any case is consistent with the liberal views we want to promote.
@ FATE
Ha ha! A TWAT button ! A great idea. Much better than getting the authorities involved every time some saddo issues an obnoxious tweet. A tweeter whose profile shows a high TWAT count can simply be blocked by others. Ostracism is a very effective way of enforcing social norms.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 06, 2013 at 05:57 PM
'A tweeter whose profile shows a high TWAT count can simply be blocked by others.'
So much opportunity for astroturfing it's like whole astro-praririe.
Posted by: BruceK | August 06, 2013 at 08:41 PM
@ BruceK
It's better than censorship (account cancellation) though, isn't it? Or getting the authorities involved.
A high TWAT count does not preclude a TWAT from being followed by others. It would be down to individual choice. A high TWAT count would simply caution a prospective follower that there may be an issue.
Posted by: Anonymous | August 06, 2013 at 10:50 PM
Yeah, the perpetual excuse making for the libertarian values of free speech. With the usual protection for race, religious, and other sort of baiting speech, with the usual expectations that law abiding citizens over there get to be abused by their rowdies (if they aren't all thought to be barbarians anyways).
Posted by: shah8 | August 07, 2013 at 02:11 AM
As has been noted elsewhere, the abuse that we are seeing on Twitter, etc. is nothing new. It's always been there in semi-public (bar) conversations and behind closed doors. All we are seeing now is the same thing being unselfconsciously expressed in public forums - something that is paralleled by our emotionally incontinent times.
Maybe this is a good thing, as it makes unacceptable views more transparent. As Luis says, more important that it is shouted down ASAP.
Posted by: gastro george | August 07, 2013 at 10:38 AM
The "twat" button principle is similar to that of "karma" adopted by geek sites such as Slashdot. Geeks were ahead in the game because of their longer exposure to explosive conduct on bulletin boards etc.
Karma scores and twat buttons are ways for the community to express pleasure/displeasure. They encourage good behaviour from people who wish to be identifiable members of a community. They have no impact on clowns and trolls who place no value on a temporary identity.
Posted by: charlieman | August 07, 2013 at 05:56 PM
The moment I saw the first sentence of this piece I was instantly reminded of the Moore-Burchill affair. That was two high-profile women taking the time to libel an awful lot of quite marginalized women. And it hasn't come as a surprise to hear of the report abuse button by seeing on my dash someone reporting that numerous trans feminists have already been silenced through the report abuse button... Hypocritical cis-bourgeois morality again, it seems.
Posted by: Valerie Keefe | August 11, 2013 at 06:00 AM
Genuinely programming is nothing however it a logic, if you obtain handle on it afterward you are the master else nothing.
Posted by: www.uncle888.com.tw/farseeing/userinfo.php?uid=23897 | August 12, 2013 at 11:03 PM
Yes you are right, YouTube is best video distribution web site, since YouTube is a lightly no much streaming time rather than other web sites.
Posted by: 220.134.186.181/modules/profile/userinfo.php?uid=1183 | August 12, 2013 at 11:03 PM
If you want to get a great deal from this paragraph then you have to apply these techniques to your won web site.
Posted by: xoops.jbhost.biz/modules/profile/userinfo.php?uid=2156 | August 12, 2013 at 11:03 PM
bnialjcp http://www.gd536x6137e6ou8xjfy89z36uo2jp5i5s.com/
bnialjcp
[url=http://www.gd536x6137e6ou8xjfy89z36uo2jp5i5s.com/]bnialjcp[/url]
Posted by: bnialjcp | August 12, 2013 at 11:08 PM
[url=http://www.gs1o073b5ocd37g13v3671c7dpds9v7ss.com/]szcpicta[/url]
szcpicta
szcpicta http://www.gs1o073b5ocd37g13v3671c7dpds9v7ss.com/
Posted by: szcpicta | August 12, 2013 at 11:08 PM
[url=http://www.gti38e82j3iuz3a4e86t69o046jw6fe2s.com/]ccydwski[/url]
ccydwski
ccydwski http://www.gti38e82j3iuz3a4e86t69o046jw6fe2s.com/
Posted by: ccydwski | August 12, 2013 at 11:08 PM
wyrfqspk
wyrfqspk http://www.gl8boi4itb0315ouj18786tm200s5o8rs.com/
[url=http://www.gl8boi4itb0315ouj18786tm200s5o8rs.com/]wyrfqspk[/url]
Posted by: wyrfqspk | August 12, 2013 at 11:08 PM
TWjBafEj
[url=http://www.1XVap2R4y9J4Ij9ojm33M1.com/]TWjBafEj[/url]
TWjBafEj http://www.1XVap2R4y9J4Ij9ojm33M1.com/
Posted by: TWjBafEj | August 12, 2013 at 11:23 PM
spaccio gucci
Portafogli Donna Gucci
Borse Gucci Online
Mocassini Uomo Gucci
GUCCI BIMBO
mocassino gucci
gucci bauletto
trolley gucci
outlet gucci toscana
SHOPPING BAG GUCCI
gucci borse catalogo
OFFERTE BORSE GUCCI
BORSE DI GUCCI
Gucci Outlet Borse
outlet gucci biella
borsa gucci prezzo
portafoglio gucci
gucci sito ufficiale
marsupio gucci
occhiali gucci
GUCCI CINTURA
catalogo gucci
PORTAFOGLIO UOMO GUCCI
gucci contatti
Gucci Torino
gucci genova
portamonete gucci
GUCCI OUTLET MILANO
Posted by: GUCCI OUTLET MILANO | August 13, 2013 at 04:04 PM
toms shoe
TOMS KIDS SHOES
toms kids
Toms Online
TOM SHOE
Toms Wholesale
TOMS OUTLET CHEAP
TOMS FLORAL UK
toms cheap
leopard print toms
toms shoes miami
TOMS OUTLET ONLINE SALE
CHEAP REAL TOMS
Toms Sale Uk
toms womens
TOMS SHOES FOR MEN
What Stores Sell Toms
tom shoes for kids
Toms Outlet Orlando
Toms For Boys
SILVER SPARKLE TOMS
who sells toms shoes
toms shoes on sale
WHERE CAN I BUY CHEAP TOMS
SHOP TOMS SHOES
TOMS OUTLET
TOMS CHEAP SIZE 13
Toms For Sale Cheap
tom shoes
KIDS TOMS
Cheap Toms Mens
TOMS GLITTER SHOES
toms clearance
Toms Store Uk
Leopard Toms Shoes
WHERE TO GET CHEAP TOMS
TOMS CHEAP OUTLET
where to buy toms online
Posted by: where to buy toms online | August 13, 2013 at 04:51 PM
Louis Vuitton
Posted by: Louis Vuitton | August 13, 2013 at 04:51 PM
www.mzt4u.com/authentic-li-shou-diet-pills-p-28.html|Incredible points. Outstanding points. Continue the amazing spirit.|This information is worth everyone's attention. When THIS botanical slimming soft gel original HELPED ME CURB APPETITE As well as GAVE ME A lot more Power I Never Need to Eating plan , THE Tablets DO Very good JOB OF STOPPING ME Eating SNACKS. AND I 'D Prefer to DO SOME Physical exercise Final MONTH TO Lose Extra FAT .
Posted by: botanical slimming soft gel original | August 13, 2013 at 09:03 PM
Questa splendida frase appena inciso
amaPi bb4arg48
Posted by: amaPi | August 29, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Chrome Hearts Signature Crosss Cotton Hoodie Jacket http://www.charmlifemall.com/chrome-hearts-accessories-chrome-hearts-belts-c-8_12.html The Spectacle-you bring us your lifestyle, we'll find the eyewear that celebrates it Chrome Hearts Accessories www.chromeheartsonsales.com
Special Sale Priced Items at 4ArmedForces.com. Many US Military products including Shirts, Hats, Pins, Decals, Patches, Flags, Magnets and more. Chrome Hearts Earrings Chrome Hearts Inc - 55 Maiden Ln San Francisco, CA, 94108
shirt chrome hearts for sale - iOffer - About Me for www chrome heart sunglasses Nau Men's Synfill Sweater
BikeIsland.com - Bicycle Parts, Accessories and Clothing at Affordable Prices with Free Shipping Custom Laser Cut License Plate Chrome Hearts Pendants Harnesses | Puchi Petwear - Designer Dog Clothing
Chrome Hearts in Honolulu, HI -- Map, Phone Number, Reviews, Photos and Video Profile for Honolulu Chrome Hearts. Chrome Hearts appears in: Restaurants chrome hearts t shirt Classical Chrome Hearts Beast Bbc Sunglasses 2012 Cheap On
Posted by: Chrome Hearts Eyewear | August 29, 2013 at 07:52 PM
Mi dispiace, niente non posso aiutarvi. Ma sono certo che troverete la giusta soluzione.
usamaPi bb4arg48
Posted by: usamaPi | August 31, 2013 at 01:23 AM
Credo che si sbaglia. Sono in grado di provarlo. Scrivere a me in PM.
kirosPi bb4arg48
Posted by: kirosPi | August 31, 2013 at 03:24 AM